It is indeed a lamentable situation when unqualified people such as myself and many others who, when faced with a crisis such as this COVID 19 “pandemic”, are forced because of a total failure of global and national leadership in the political, medical, social, religious and ethical arenas, in an attempt to protect family and loved ones, need to compile such documents as presented here for basic guidelines!
Thus that being said please note that what follows is not in any way, shape or form to be viewed as medical advice for COVID 19 or any of the “ resulting mutations / variants”, their proposed ensuing medical procedures, any other medical, financial, legal or other qualified counsel in any field what-so-ever; it is just my considered opinion drawn from public sources readily available. EACH PERSON MUST MAKE THEIR OWN DECISIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR OWN CONSCIENCE REGARDING THIS OR ANY OTHER MATTER - YOU ALONE ARE ANSWERABLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS!
I have been requested to share an abridged compilation of these publicly sourced opinions regarding this COVID 19 situation including the as “to be expected” social and official reactions and ramifications to such a crisis. Needless to say that the coercion; the forever changing stories; the disrespect for Law and the lack of transparency exhibited by leadership and Pharmaceutical stake holders has resulted in there being a large amount of distrust by the public at large when viewing the leadership and their guidance in these times.
The public quite correctly are asking for the truth, clarity and guidance in this matter ESPECIALLY in and around the contents of the vaccine formulae and any potential discomforts and health repercussions one could reasonably expect from such administration of said formulae which is now being propagated globally by leadership, Pharma, UN, WHO etc - thus I do believe that we have a shared social responsibility to try and protect each other and make the necessary efforts to comply with this request if the leadership will NOT! So in an effort to meet those social and public requests here are my very distilled opinions rendered down to two questions which I offer for your consideration in an attempt to try and fill a void of "double-speak and duplicity" seemingly deliberately created by those tasked with leadership / control / safety roles.
Again - Please Each person MUST act freely and voluntarily when approaching this matter - DO NOT JUST REFUSE THE VACCINATIONS: BUT let us rather try and provide those wanting to coerce and force these procedures on us with a legal reason for us NOT TO ACCEPT THEM SHOULD ONE SO CHOOSE!
Let us rather, if approached, ask politely:
l “Has the vaccination MRC5 in it’s make-up?” (See point 1 below - in short - this refers to aborted fetal cells and other forms of DNA) If it has you may decline: If the health worker cannot give a definitive answer to this question you may decline.
l “Is Iatrogenic Reaction possible?” (It will be if the MRC5 process is adopted in the formulae make-up - Iatrogenic Reaction occurs when medical or surgical treatment causes a new illness or injury, this result, which is considered to be iatrogenic, may very well result from injecting foreign DNA and other unknown elements into the body.)
Here is some background information one may want to research IF ONE SHOULD ASK THE ABOVE QUESTIONS:
1. Has the vaccine MRC 5? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polio_vaccine
(Medical Research Council cell strain 5) is a diploid cell culture line composed of fibroblasts, originally developed from the lung tissue of a 14-week-old aborted Caucasian male foetus. The cell line was isolated by J.P. Jacobs and colleagues in September 1966 from the seventh population doubling of the original strain, and MRC-5 cells themselves are known to reach senescence in around 45 population doublings).
MRC-5 cells are currently used to produce several vaccines including for hepatitis A, varicella and polio. This culture is said to also be drawn from other sources of DNA.
2. Is iatrogenic reaction possible?
Iatrogenesis is the causation of a disease, a harmful complication, or other ill effect by any medical activity, including diagnosis, intervention, error, or negligence.
If either of the above questions is in the affirmative one can refuse to have the inoculation.
The use of common sense when trying to address those tasked with enforcing this matter of mandatory inoculations will not work and the copious amount of legal jargon surrounding whether these procedures are experimental or not would require that one would need a high-power team of legal experts and 20 years to sift through all the documentation, contracts and so forth so to make a definitive stand on the much voiced Nuremberg Code so right now trying to make a case on this Code could just cause more confusion than clarity and bankruptcy - thus it would be my suggestion, and the one that I lean towards at this time, to go with the two questions posted above - this hopefully will give one time to catch ones breath and hopefully gather ones wits if one is suddenly set upon at home or where-ever by those whom I expect will be sent door to door in an effort to enforce mandatory procedures.
Another thing being hotly debated is are there nano technologies included, incorporated or planned for these vaccines? Again this for us, the unschooled in this area, a proverbial minefield is waiting for us to be set-off! I would really suggest stick to the basics above.
This, as I have said, is an abridged document which has been very simply presented for two basic reasons: Firstly the TRUTH is always simple and secondly I for one need to keep it simple as I do not have the knowledge or qualifications to enter into any form of medical debate and refusal of inoculation on ethical and religious grounds is just not going to cut it I fear.
There are good lawyers and advocates out there who deal with legal aspects such as The Namibian Constitution which grants the citizenry certain rights in the matters at hand - please, should you feel so led, study this out for yourself and contact these legal professionals.
The above has been compiled with the emphasis on a very basic secular medico-legal framework with no emphasis on Religious norms and conscience and this I have purposefully done taking into consideration the spirit of 1 Cor 6:1 and 4: However for those contemplating seeking a Biblical foundation on how to approach this entire matter, an approach upon which I wholeheartedly agree with, please may I suggest you consider 1 Cor 6:9-20 and as read with 2 Cor 6:14-18 and Rev 18:4 as a jumping off point. I really do believe that these procedures, be they as lethal as portrayed or not, WILL MAKE THE TEMPLE, YOUR REDEEMED BODY THROUGH MESSIAH, UNCLEAN FOR HIS USE!
I for one personally try to avoid these secular / political conundrums however Scriptures such as Luk_22:36; Psa_82:3-4; Pro_24:11-12 arw a portion of my calling and found in Eze 2:5-7 and Eze 3:17-21 require of me to Blow The Shofar when seeing danger coming, and I see the danger not only coming but already here at the gates, indeed within the gates of our cities and the doors of our homes!
Walking in these times will cost us - are we prepared to pay the price required?
Finally, confusion abounds in the world right now and our YHWH Elohim is not an Author of Confusion - but rather The Author and Finisher of our eternal Salvation and Faith - 1 Cor 14:33; Heb 5:9 and Heb 12:2……. should we not be seeking Him and His Salvation in these dire of times?
Compiled by Boaz - 12/01/22.
